Archive for the ‘Portland Plan’ Category

h1

Phase II Portland Plan Workshops

March 11, 2010

The dates for the Phase II workshops are set!

This phase is all about setting direction:

In this phase, we will consider where we want to go. What are our targets, and how might we get there? What are the things we could do to move in the right direction?

Don’t miss the workshop near you:

Southeast
April 26, 6:30–9 pm
Central Catholic High School, Cafeteria
2401 SE Stark Street
Portland, OR 97214

Northeast
April 29, 6:30–9 pm
Beaumont Middle School Cafeteria
4043 NE Fremont Street
Portland, OR 97212

North
May 1, 10 am–12:30 pm
University Park Community Center
Multi-purpose Gym
9009 N Foss Avenue
Portland, OR 97203
*childcare provided in Cesar Chavez room

Central City
May 10, 6:30–9 pm
University of Oregon, White Stag Block
Rooms 142 & 144
70 NW Couch Street
Portland, OR 97209

East
May 15, 10 am–12:30 pm
David Douglas High School, Cafeteria (North)
1001 SE 135th Ave
Portland, OR 97233
*childcare provided in room #122

West
May 18, 6:30–9 pm
Jackson Middle School Cafeteria
10625 SW 35th Avenue
Portland, OR 97219

h1

Get Your Geek On

March 9, 2010

For those of you who are pining for the last set of Portland Plan workshops and can’t wait for round 2 (more on that later) we’ve got a fix for you.

There’s a technical team for each of the 9 subject areas in the Portland Plan, and they’re holding workshop meetings that you can sit in on, and informally discuss the topics with the team.

Here’s the full set:

To prepare for Phase II, we have established nine Technical Action Groups (TAGs), one for each of the Portland Plan action areas. The TAGs include staff from City bureaus and our 19 partner agencies. They have synthesized the thousands of comments from the public meetings and surveys, the data from the VisionPDX process and information from the Portland Plan Background reports (http://www.portlandonline.com/portlandplan/index.cfm?c=51427). The result of this work will be the basis for the information shared during the Phase II workshops in April and May.

The TAGs are convening additional work sessions during March to review information that will help shape the development of the Phase II workshops. Each of you has special expertise in different arenas. We would appreciate your involvement in these workshops to help us set direction for the next steps for the Portland Plan.

Please join us at one or more of the meetings listed below. Be prepared to roll up your sleeves!

Sustainability and the Natural Environment

Wednesday, March 10, 2010, 6:00-8:00 p.m.

1900 SW 4thAvenue, Portland, Oregon 97201 – Room 2500A (2nd Floor)

Human Health, Food and Public Safety

Tuesday, March 16, 2010 6:00-8:00 p.m.

1900 SW 4th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97201 – Room 2500 (2nd Floor)

Neighborhoods and Housing

Thursday, March 18, 2010, 6:00-8:00 p.m.

1900 SW 4thAvenue, Portland, Oregon 97201 – Room 2500B (2nd Floor)

Education and Skill Development

Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 6:00-8:00 p.m.

1900 SW 4th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97201 – Room 2500 (2nd Floor)

Transportation, Technology and Access

Thursday, March 25, 2010, 6:00-8:00 p.m.

1120 SW 5th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204 – Room C (2nd Floor)

Arts, Culture and Innovation

Monday, March 29, 2010, 6:00-8:00 p.m. Tuesday, March 23, 2010 6:00-8:oo p.m.

1900 SW 4thAvenue, Portland, Oregon 97201 – Room 7A (7th Floor)

Prosperity and Business Success

Tuesday, March 30, 2010, 7:30-9:30 a.m.

1900 SW 4thAvenue, Portland, Oregon 97201 – Room 7A (7th Floor)

Design, Planning and Public Spaces

Wednesday, March 31, 2010, 6:30-8:30 p.m.

Jean Vollum Natural Capital Center “Ecotrust” – Billy Frank, Jr. Conference Center

721 NW 9th Avenue, Portland, Oregon  97209

Equity, Quality of Life and Civic Engagement

Thursday, April 1, 2010, 6:00-8:00 p.m.

1120 SW 5th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204 – Room C (2nd Floor)

For more information, please visit: http://www.portlandonline.com/portlandplan/index.cfm?a=289660&c=50730.

h1

Where Do the Jobs Go?

February 8, 2010

As we process the Portland Plan background reports, one of the most fascinating in my opinion is the Economic Opportunities Analysis – Alternative Choices (PDF).

It sets up a series of choices about where we plan for jobs in the next 25 years.

As background, Portland has about 40% of the jobs in the region (excellent when compared to other cities that are centers of their regions). But during the period from 2000-2006, we only captured about 11% of new  jobs. Over the period the Portland Plan covers (through 2035), we want to do better and expect (hope?) that somewhere between 18% and 36% of new jobs will locate in the City.

The report looks at different types of spaces and locations where we might accommodate these jobs, and what kind of public investments and policies this would take. Some of the locations types are:

  • Central City Office Space – there was relatively little new demand for this in the last decade, but we have lots of zoned capacity – what will the demand be in the next 25 years?
  • Do we need an Office cluster outside the Central City? An office center at Gateway or the Airport might provide lower cost office space to compete with places like Kruse Way and help improve jobs/housing balance by providing employment locations in the eastern part of the City.
  • Incubator space – inexpensive space where new companies can get started. Today the Central Eastside and Lower Albina play this role, but the projection is for more demand than these areas can handle. Should we upzone these areas or look for other areas for this function? Could this be an additional role that Gateway could fill?
  • Town Centers, neighborhood commercial districts and commercial corridors – what kind of jobs could/should go here and how do we plan for them?
  • Campus development – we have a few sites (Conway, Post Office site) that could work for new campus developments. What kinds of employers need it and how do they fit into the bigger picture?
  • Industrial space – how much do we need and where does it need to go. Can some of it be built ‘up’ in multistory development, or does it all need to be single-story?

Of course, all of this only makes sense where and when the private sector creates these jobs. How do we create City plans that are flexible and responsive to what will surely be changing trends in the private sector over the new few decades?

Come tell us what you think! We have two more hearings on the background reports:

  • Tuesday, February 9th, 1:15pm
  • Tuesday, March 9th, 1:15pm

The meeting on March 9th will focus on land supply, so would be particularly apt for this topic, but you’re welcome to testify on any topic at either of the hearings.

h1

Coming Up on February 9th

February 4, 2010

Official Agenda

12:30pm – Milwaukie Light Rail, PSU to OMSI (briefing)

1:15pm – Portland Plan, overview of Periodic Review process and hearing on background data.

Come out and tell us what you think about the background reports!

h1

Infill, Historic Preservation and Corridors

February 1, 2010

Over the weekend I had the opportunity to attend an excellent workshop hosted by the Architectural Heritage Center on “Infill in Traditional Neighborhoods”.

Infill is not a new topic for me. I had a chance to study it in depth when I served on the City Club’s study on “Increasing Density in Portland” that looked at how Portland could achieve the increases in housing suggested by the Metro 2040 Growth Plan adopted in the mid-’90s. Two take-aways from that study that have continued to guide me are:

  • As much as possible put density in new neighborhoods on brownfields (like the Pearl and South Waterfront).
  • Where infill must be used, design will be critical.

Traditional neighborhoods are also not new to me, having served for almost a decade on the board of my neighborhood association in NW Portland. During my service a big chunk of our neighborhood was placed on the National Register of Historic Places as the “Alphabet Historic District” through the efforts of a number of dedicated volunteers and support from the City (I get none of the credit, I was working on parking issues at the time…).

So while the topics weren’t new to me, the workshop did open up some ideas for me, principally around the idea of “compatibility”. In the past I’ve thought of compatibility of new development with the existing neighborhood primarily in terms of building height, building mass and building style (e.g., modern versus traditional, etc.). But some important ideas that the workshop brought up were issues of compatibility with the development patterns of surrounding buildings: does the new development match the setback patterns of surrounding building? Is the use of green space similar? Are the building types (e.g., residential over storefront) similar even if the style is different?

In particular, this got me thinking about our major transit corridor streets, since our strategy is to focus much of our housing growth on these streets. It seems to me that as this planned growth occurs, we are necessarily going to see (indeed are already seeing in some somes places) buildings that are often larger than their neighbors (the current zoning generally already supports this). Given this reality, what other elements can we focus on to retain the character of our main street corridors, while helping them evolve to meet our future needs? How should the Portland Plan create supportive policies for this?

While we’re speaking of growth and buildings, I would note some opportunities for citizens to speak to these issues NOW in the Portland Plan process. The Urban Form Report gives a very educational view of what kinds of building heights and massings the current zoning supports. At our last hearing we received testimony that these heights and masses would surprise many people! The good news is that there is enough existing zoned capacity for housing that the Portland Plan should not need to do wholesale up-zoning to support projected growth. Indeed, there might be opportunities from some selective down-zoning to protect environmental assets. Your next opportunity to testify is at our February 9th hearing. Tell us how you think Portland Plan policies should focus this growth.

And on the topic of growth, there was testimony at our last hearing that the growth numbers appear to keep changing. At our meeting on March 9th, we’ll be visiting assumptions about land supply and staff will have the opportunity to review how the growth projections were arrived at. Come out, list, learn and testify!

h1

Checking in on the Portland Plan Process

January 14, 2010

A few updates as the effort keeps on keeping on:

  • The city-wide compilation of survey results from the seven Portland Plan workshops is now available online. Over 900 people attended the workshops. While they were NOT representative of the City as a whole (the attendees were less diverse and more affluent than the overall population), the input of 900 motivated citizens is always informative. Transit, walkability and access to greenspaces and trails scored high.
  • You can still take the survey online! The Mayor has extended the deadline to March 31.
  • A new flyer is available for the three Planning Commission Hearings on the “existing conditions” that will inform the Portland Plan. While each hearing has a topic, we want to be clear that citizens are welcome to discuss any Portland Plan issue at any one of the three hearings. And City Council won’t formally adopt existing condition findings until closer to the end of the year, so don’t panic! Keep the conversation going… the first hearing is January 26th at 6pm.
h1

Readers Digest Version of Portland Plan Documents

January 6, 2010

Earlier in the week I enthused about all the great info in the Portland Plan background reports.

The project team has just put up summary document that takes the executive summary from each background report and combines them in one easy-to-download PDF file for those of you who used the Cliff Notes in college. All that policy squeezed into 75 pages…

h1

How I Spent My Christmas Vacation: Geeking Out on the Portland Plan Documents

January 4, 2010

OK, I’m a wonk. I spent a chunk of my holiday break curled up with two three-ring binders worth of background reports – and found it fascinating.

But you don’t have to wade through thousands of pages to comprehend the issues. The project team has produced a great handbook that lays out the key issues in about 40 pages. I think this is really helpful. We used the handbook approach during the development of the Streetcar System Concept Plan and citizens told us it helped them comprehend the issues.

But I don’t want to diminish the background reports themselves. They are an amazing compilation of the key programs, systems and infrastructure that comprise the City. And they comprehensively and clearly lay out the opportunities, challenges and policy trade-offs that we’re going to have to grapple with. If you’re ready to dig in (or just graze a bit), here’s the full list:

Arts and Culture (PDF)
Arts and Culture – Overview (PDF)
Arts and Culture – Snapshot (PDF)
Economic Development (PDF)
Economic Development – Overview (PDF)
Economic Development – Snapshot (PDF)
Economic Opportunities Analysis (PDF) – Task 1 – Trends, Opportunities and Martket Factors
Economic Opportunities Analysis (PDF) – Task 2/3 – Supply and Demand
Economic Opportunities Analysis (PDF) – Task 4 – Alternative Choices
Energy (PDF)
Energy – Overview (PDF)
Energy – Snapshot (PDF)
Evaluation of Economic Specialization (PDF)
Food Systems (PDF)
Food Systems – Overview (PDF)
Food Systems – Snapshot (PDF)
Food Systems Maps (PDF)
Historic Resources (PDF) – Report 1: Key Findings and Recommendations
Historic Resources (PDF) – Report 2: Data and Maps
Historic Resources (PDF) – Report 3: Understanding Historic Resources in Portland
Historic Resources – Overview (PDF)
Historic Resources – Snapshot (PDF)
Housing – Overview (PDF)
Housing – Snapshot (PDF)
Housing Affordability (PDF)
Housing and Transportation Cost Study (PDF)
Housing Supply (PDF)
Human Health and Safety (PDF)
Human Health and Safety – Overview (PDF)
Human Health and Safety – Snapshot (PDF)
Infrastructure – Snapshot (PDF)
Infrastructure Condition and Capacity (PDF)
Infrastructure Condition and Capacity – Overview (PDF)
Infrastructure Condition and Capacity Maps Part 1 (PDF)
Infrastructure Condition and Capacity Maps Part 2 (PDF)
Natural Resource Inventory (PDF)
Natural Resource Inventory – Overview (PDF)
Natural Resource Inventory – Snapshot (PDF)
Public Schools (PDF)
Urban Forestry (PDF)
Urban Forestry – Overview (PDF)
Urban Forestry – Snapshot (PDF)
Urban Form (PDF)
Urban Form – Overview (PDF)
Urban Form – Snapshot (PDF)
Watershed Health (PDF)
Watershed Health – Overview (PDF)
Watershed Health – Snapshot (PDF)

If you’d like to read hardcopies of these, rather than download them, they’re available in your local library branch or neighborhood coalition office.

My compliments to the staff (in many bureaus) who produced these reports. I doubt that many cities have this kind of comprehensive view available.

As we move through the process, I hope to highlight issues from a number of these reports in future posts!

And these documents are not just informative, they play an official role in the Portland Plan process. Planning Commission and City Council will hold hearings on and adopt this content as the ‘existing conditions’ for the Portland Plan and Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commission will hold a series of three hearings (download the flyer PDF) starting on January 26th. Come out and tell us what YOU think. See you there.

h1

Portland Plan Participants Vote for Transit

December 22, 2009

Sarah Mirk at the Mercury beat me to an analysis I intended to present here, looking at the voting trends of Portland Plan workshop participants on the question of where to prioritization transportation investments.

As Sarah points out, transit was the cumulative vote winner, and I believe was the top vote getter in at least three of the seven workshops. But it did vary by neighborhood, with bicycle infrastructure on top in NE Portland and sidewalks in outer East Portland.

To be clear, the survey is NOT (and not claimed to be) scientific, and doesn’t really focus on what the City of Portland spends versus what other governments like TriMet and ODOT spend inside our city limits.

h1

Food Miles at the Portland Plan

December 15, 2009

A tonight’s Portland Plan workshop I sat in on a table discussion that turned to food supply.

One participant bemoaned that he went to a local outlet of a national grocery chain and found hazelnuts grown in Turkey and packaged in Thailand – when we know that 70% of the world’s hazelnuts are grown in Oregon!

The reason is that national chains often make national sourcing arrangements – usually to the lowest cost supplier. The result is that your food may travel hundreds if not thousands of miles to get to you.

The counter-example cited by another participant at the table was Burgerville – a regional chain that makes a point of buying local ingredients.

Draw you own conclusions…

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.